A Review of the Bioactivity of Plant Products Against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)
The mosquito Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) is a disease vector for several pathogens that affect human health worldwide. Therefore, there is a need to produce synthetic chemicals that can effectively control mosquitoes; however, these chemicals can also cause a range of environmental and health problems. In the present review, we compiled all available information from the literature between 2005 and 2018 on plant products that have been used to control A. aegypti and tabulated their modes of action. This review classifies these plant-based products according to their bioactivities (toxicity, repellency, feeding deterrence, and oviposition deterrence) and provides new insights, findings, and patterns of their application. Plants contain a wide spectrum of chemical compounds that can effectively control mosquito populations; therefore, they should be developed to control diseases transmitted by mosquitoes. Plant products are mostly safe for human, animal, and environmental health. Moreover, because of the diversity and low use of plant-derived compounds as insect control agents, mosquitoes have not acquired resistance to them. The present review indicated that the bioactivities of many plant compounds can effectively control A. aegypti in laboratory conditions, and the comprehensive cataloging and classification of natural plant product bioactivities in this review will facilitate the search for new applications of these substances in insect pest control strategies.Abstract
The mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) transmits viruses that cause many diseases, such as yellow fever, chikungunya, dengue, and Zika viruses, that threaten human health (Githeko et al. 2000, Hennessey et al. 2016, Gregory et al. 2017). Aedes aegypti is 4–7 mm in length, has black coloration with white dots on its legs, and has white lines on its thorax (Carpenter and LaCasse 1955). After mating, the females bite humans, mammals, and birds to obtain the blood needed to meet its protein requirements for oviposition. Female A. aegypti can bite at any time of the day, but biting frequency tends to increase at sunset (Carpenter and LaCasse 1955). Female mosquitoes lay eggs five times in their lifespan; they produce approximately 100–200 eggs after a full blood meal. The lifespan of A. aegypti can range from 2 weeks to 1 mo, and its eggs are laid individually in stagnant water around houses, in containers, and in tree holes. When the eggs hatch, the larvae survive for approximately 4 d on water-based food sources, such as algae, and then fast for 2 d during pupation, after which the adult mosquitoes emerge (Zettel and Kaufman 2012).
Control of mosquito populations is one of the most effective ways to reduce the spread of viral diseases transmitted mainly by mosquitoes. Chemicals can control disease vector mosquitoes, but they are associated with several disadvantages. Therefore, researchers have focused on assessing the efficacy of plant-based pesticides and identifying their active ingredients to produce safe and effective pest control products. More than 2,000 plant species are known to produce chemicals with medicinal and insecticidal properties that could have a potential role in pest control programs (Ghosh et al. 2012). Previous reviews focused mainly on the bioactivity of plant extracts and essential oils in laboratory formulations, and few of these are actually used for mosquito control in practice. The present review aimed to compile information published between 2005 and 2018 on plant products that could be used to control A. aegypti. The bioactivities of these compounds are classified as toxic, repellent, antifeeding, or oviposition deterrent activities in mosquitos.
Mosquito Control Using Plant Products
Plants contain chemicals that are effective against certain target insects, which could be used to control mosquitoes and reduce their spread. Plant products are generally considered less harmful for humans and the environment than synthetic chemicals (Bokhari et al. 2014, Gbolade et al. 2000, Shivakumar et al. 2013, Nasir et al. 2015); therefore, plant products are regarded as ideal substitutes for conventional chemical pesticides (Ngadino and Sudjarwo 2017). Plant products are also abundant sources of effective and biodegradable biological compounds, and insect resistance to these products is limited; however, in the development of alternative pest control substances, the risk of insect tolerance merits serious consideration and further investigation.
Numerous studies have shown that plants and their products can be used to control all life stages of mosquitoes (Table 1) and may exhibit repellent, toxic, antifeeding, or antioviposition effects. Most of the plant products tabulated in Table 1 are indicated as toxic and have various types of bioactivity. The present review catalogs these products and classifies their bioactivities based on their effectiveness.







Toxic Effect of Plant Products on Mosquitoes
Pest control involves the use of materials to kill or reduce the number of the target insects. Such materials are classified according to their modes of action (e.g. acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or antagonists, sodium channel blockers, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists) and their methods of administration to insects (e.g. contact, ingestion, and fumigation). Toxicity can be quantified by calculating the concentration-mortality or dose-mortality responses to the compound.
Plants contain chemical compounds, such as flavonoids, tannins, saponins, alkaloids, and volatile oils, that are known for their toxic effects against various types of insects (Ngadino and Sudjarwo 2017). Moreover, plant products have various modes of action against target insects. The most prominent of these modes is acetylcholinesterase inhibition or octopamine antireception, both of which impair insect nervous system function, resembling the effects of certain chemical pesticides. Studies have shown that volatile and monoturbo oils can cause insect death by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase (Sendi and Ebadollahi 2013). In addition, many plant oils can harm insect nervous systems by affecting ketamine receptors (Sendi and Ebadollahi 2013). Certain plant-derived compounds mimic acetylcholine in mammalian neuromuscular centers and cause spasms and twitches to occur in rapid succession, which lead to the death of target insects (Ware 2000). Furthermore, certain plant products affect sensory nerves of the superficial nervous system in insects. However, there are also plant products that do not affect the insect nervous system. For example, limonene extracted from citrus peel does not affect cholinesterase (Ware 2000). Previous studies have shown that certain plant compounds, such as azadirachtin extracted from the seeds of Azadirachta indica A. Juss, exhibit pesticidal activities (Ware 2000) by mimicking growth regulators, influencing maturation and senescence, and causing death. Moreover, seed and leaf extracts of Argemone mexicana L. differ in efficacy against mosquitoes (Sakthivadivel and Daniel 2008). Modes of action can, thus, vary even between extracts from the same plant.
Plant Products Used as Mosquito Repellents
Natural or chemically produced repellents are nontoxic, but their appearance, flavor, and odor can change insect behavior. Mosquitoes are naturally attracted to human body temperature, respiration, and carbon dioxide exhalation (Tauxe et al. 2013); however, repellents can prevent mosquitoes from landing on exposed skin. The effectiveness of repellent products is rated in several ways and a common method involves the use of an olfactometer and volunteers. Mosquito bites with and without repellent application are counted and repellent effectiveness is calculated using the Weaving and Sylvester formula (Weaving and Sylvester 1967): repellency (%) = 100 – number of bites on control arm/number of bites on treated arm × 100. In most studies, plant product repellency is calculated using the formula from Sharma and Ansari (1994) and Yap et al. (1998): repellency (%) = C – T/C × 100 where C = number of bites in the control and T = number of bites in the treated group.
Currently available repellents include allethrin, N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, dimeth-yl phthalate, and N,N-diethyl mandelic acid amide, which repel mosquitoes effectively but are reported as unsafe for common use (Roland et al. 1985, Zadikoff 1979). Therefore, researchers are attempting to find alternative repellents from natural plant sources with efficacy comparable to those of conventional products but without any harmful effects to users. The ideal products should be nontoxic, environmentally friendly, unlikely to damage sensitive skin, and safe for children from the age of three months (Patel et al. 2012). However, these products may be costly and may require frequent or repeated application because they evaporate quickly. Moreover, certain products may cause allergic reactions when applied directly to the skin (Patel et al. 2012). The efficacy of repellents can be improved by changing their chemical structures to increase their stability and their ability to remain in contact with the skin for longer periods of time (Maji et al. 2007).
The efficacy of plant products as mosquito repellent depends on several factors, such as the type of repellent material, application method, environmental factors, exposure duration, and insect pest sensitivity (Maia and Moore 2011). Plant-based repellents can be included in aerosols, wet wipes, creams, or moisturizers. The quantity of repellent used will vary with the type of materials it is suspended in. Plant volatile oils could replace synthetic insect repellents because the former consist of monoterpenes, such as cineole, eugenol, terpinolene, camphor, citronella, limonene, citronellol, thymol, and α-pinene; all of which exhibit insect repellent effects (Yang et al. 2004). These plant oils can be used as topical insect repellents and as oviposition deterrents (Gershenzon and Dudareva 2007).
Plant Products as Antifeedants
Antifeedants are substances with high vapor concentrations that alter behavior and inhibit feeding in insects. Many plants contain natural antifeedants to protect themselves against insect herbivory. There are several differences between repellents and antifeedants. A substance that provides a long duration of protection and lowers biting rate is considered both a highly efficient repellent and an antifeedant. However, a compound that confers protection for only a short time but lowers biting rate is considered more effective as an antifeedant than a repellent. In contrast, a product that provides long protection but does not lower biting rate is probably more effective as a repellent than an antifeedant (Phasomkusolsil and Soonwera 2011). Ali et al. (2015) demonstrated that essential oils in Echinophora lamondiana Yildiz & Z. Bahcecioglu had biting deterrent activity due to high levels of pure terpinolene.
Certain plant-based antifeedants prevent muscle contraction and feeding in insects (Ware 2000). Other antifeedants affect the taste organs (peripheral sensilla) of insects to deter them from feeding. Antifeedants can be sprayed in the field in the same way as pesticides.
Plant Products as Oviposition Deterrents
During oviposition, female mosquitoes rest on water surfaces at sites suitable for the growth of hatching larvae. Their antennas contain chemoreceptors that guide them towards appropriate oviposition sites (McBride et al. 2014). The eggs are laid individually on water surfaces either in natural or human-made environments, such as standing water in tires and vases (Wong et al. 2011). Mosquito populations can be controlled by preventing oviposition by using plants and various plant compounds. Therefore, these plant products could be used to control the spread of viruses transmitted by these mosquitoes (Da Silva Alves et al. 2015). Oviposition deterrence is quantified by the oviposition active index (OAI). OAI is calculated using the formula described by Kramer and Mulla (1979) and Xue et al. (2001): ER (%) = NC– NT/NC× 100 where ER = effective repellency, NC= control number of eggs, and NT= total number of eggs. Substances with OAI of <0.3 are considered repellents, whereas those with OAI of >0.3 are regarded as attractants. Plants and their products that function as oviposition deterrents are listed in Table 2, with citations arranged by publication year.


Conclusions
More than 2,000 plant species that belong to the Meliaceae, Rutaceae, Asteraceae, Cladophoraceae, Labiatae, and Apocynaceae families produce insecticidal chemicals (Ghosh et al. 2012, Shaalan et al. 2005). The effectiveness of products derived from the same plant may vary with the organ from which the products were extracted (Wannang et al. 2015). The type of solvent used for extraction can also determine the effectiveness of the plant product at eliminating mosquitoes. Examples of common solvents used in plant compound extraction are n-hexane, acetone, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and methanol. The median lethal concentrations (LC50) of the extracts may vary with the type of solvent used possibly because of the differences in solvent composition and extraction ratio/ efficiency (Ghosh et al. 2012, Shivakumar et al. 2013). Several studies have shown that extraction method influences the relative mosquito-controlling effectiveness of the plant extract. Plant extracts may be prepared by distillation using commercial oils or solvents (Kiplang’at and Mwangi 2014, Nasir et al. 2015, Soonwera 2015a, Sritabutra et al. 2011). Plant age (young, mature, old) can also affect the quality of the products extracted from collected samples (Fernandez et al. 2014).
A very important point we have tried to stress in this review is the lack of standardization of plant parts, extraction protocols, and other parameters used in the currently available studies. This limitation prevents us to reasonably compare the results of multiple studies. Methodological standardization could allow us to make these comparisons and accelerate the identification and development of plant-based mosquito-control agents. The present review categorized the bioactivity of mosquito-control compounds, which can guide the standardization of natural plant product classification.
Plants are rich sources of compounds that could improve disease vector control. Research efforts should focus on the development of plant products that can effectively control disease-bearing mosquitoes and be commercially applied as soon as testing confirms their long-term human, animal, and environmental safety. It is preferable to develop products that can be used at all stages of mosquito development (egg, larva, pupa, and adult) and that disrupt the insect life cycle. The plants selected for use as pest control product sources should be easily cultivated, accessible, cost-effective, and sustainable.
Contributor Notes