On eight of 18 sampling dates, significantly more (p < 0.05) American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), adults were found on or within 0.3 m of cotton sheets, baited with dry ice for 2 h, than on an equal number of unbaited sheets. Overall 4 times more ticks were at the baited sheets than the controls. Dragging vegetation in old fields, along woods edges and dirt roads and within woods, for ca. 16 of the 20 m between dry ice baits collected > 3 times more ticks than the dry ice; significantly more (p < 0.05) ticks on nine of the 18 sampling dates and never significantly (p < 0.05) fewer. On two of 18 sampling dates, dry ice baits attracted no ticks while ticks were found by dragging and on three sampling dates dry ice catches were < 3% of the corresponding drag catches. Dragging the same transects the day before or after dry ice sampling caught as many ticks as on the sampling days. No immature D. variabillis were collected by the dragging or dry ice method. In this study dragging was more reliable, faster, (one visit to a transect instead of two), and easier (lighter equipment) than short duration dry ice sampling. Neither method collected more than one tick in 32 samples in wooded areas.