Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jan 2018

Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Larvicidal and Ovicidal Properties of Extracts from Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) Isolated from Soils1

,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 17 – 26
DOI: 10.18474/JES17-21.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

The actinomycete Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) was isolated from soil samples collected from the Venganayakkan region in Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. The strain was identified using 16S rRNA sequencing, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA4 software with sequences submitted to GenBank. In laboratory bioassays, crude extracts of secondary metabolites of the actinomycete demonstrated larvicidal and ovicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Anopheles stephensi Liston, but not against Aedes aegypti L. These results suggest that metabolites of S. vinaceusdrappus S12-4 may have value in development of alternatives to conventional chemical insecticides for control of mosquito populations.

The actinomycetes (Actinobacteria: Actinomycetales) are Gram-positive filamentous microbes and are sources of a large proportion of natural antimicrobial drug compounds (Ishida et al. 1965, Valanarasu et al. 2008). More than 80% of the biologically active secondary metabolites derived from soil actinomycetes are from the genus Streptomyces (Demain 2006, Edwards 1992, Vining 1992). Actinomycetes play an important role in biological control of agricultural and mosquito insect pests through the production of secondary metabolites with insecticidal properties (Bream et al. 2001, Sundarapandian et al. 2002). Such metabolites are being increasingly studied for potential development as insecticides (El-Khawagh et al. 2011). Thus, the study reported herein was aimed at isolating the actinomycete Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) from soil samples from Western Ghats in India and assessing extracts for their larvicidal and ovicidal properties against the mosquitoes Culex quinquefasciatus Say, Anopheles stephensi Liston, and Aedes aegypti L.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and characterization of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4)

Soil samples were collected from the Venganayakkan region of Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India, and transported aseptically to the laboratory using sterile plastic containers. Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) which, through preliminary screening was shown to be biologically active against mosquito larvae, was isolated from the soil samples by drop-plating serial dilutions of the samples onto Actinomycetes Isolation Agar in petri dishes. The dishes were incubated at 28°C for 10–14 d (Valanarasu et al. 2009). The pure isolate was characterized morphologically and physiologically as per Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Locci 1989) at various pH levels, sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations, temperatures, and on various growth media for differing lengths of incubation for optimal production. The more biologically active isolates were selected for biochemical characterization using a biochemical kit (KB014 HiAcinetobacter Identification Kit, HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Secondary metabolite extraction

Five liters of the International Streptomyces Project No. 2 (ISP-2) broth in an Erlenmeyer flask were inoculated with an active isolate of S12-4 and incubated at 28°C for 10–14 d. The culture was then centrifuged at 3,293 × g for 15 min to separate the biomass and supernatant. The biomass was immersed in methanol and the supernatant was mixed in an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The solvent was separated using a separating funnel and concentrated with a vacuum rotary evaporator at 50°C. The resultant extract was transferred to a sterile vial at −20°C (Saravanakumar et al. 2012).

Antibiotic sensitivity

A slightly modified disc diffusion method as described by Yao (2002) was used to assess antibiotic sensitivity of isolate S12-4. The isolate culture was grown on slants of ISP-2 agar at 28°C for 2–4 d. Aliquots of these cultures were mixed in 5 ml sterile water (Waksmans 1961) and, within 1 h, the suspension was drop-plated and uniformly spread on the surface of ISP-2 agar in petri dishes and allowed to air-dry for 15 min. Commercially prepared discs of 37 antibiotics were placed on the surface of the agar and removed after 30 min at room temperature allowing for diffusion into the medium. These plates were incubated at 28°C for 2–3 d. Zones of inhibition were measured and recorded in millimeters.

Insects and bioassays

Culex quinquefasciatus, An. stephensi, and Ae. aegypti larvae were obtained from colonies maintained at the Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai. The colonies were maintained at 75–85% relative humidity and 27 ± 1°C and on a light phase of 11 ± 0.5 h. Larvae were fed with dog food and brewer's yeast in a 3:2 ratio.

Larvicidal activity of the crude extract of isolate S12-4 was evaluated using a slightly modified method of the World Health Organization (2005). Concentrations of 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 ppm were prepared using 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Third-instar larvae were placed in each suspension, with 20 larvae per replicate and 5 replicates per concentration and mosquito species. DMSO and water alone, each without the extract, served as controls. Numbers of dead larvae were counted 24 h after exposure. Mortality data were corrected using Abbott's (1925) and were subjected to probit analysis (US EPA Probit Analysis software, version 1.5) to estimate concentration–mortality response to the S12-4 extract.

Ovicidal activity was evaluated using modified methods of Elango et al. (2009). The concentrations were prepared as previously described with the same treatments and numbers of replicates. Twenty newly deposited eggs of three mosquito species were placed in the treatment suspensions. Eggs were monitored using stereomicroscope (Wild M7S TYP 308700, Switzerland). The number of unhatched versus hatched eggs was tabulated at 120 h after initial exposure to the treatments. Unhatched eggs were identified as those with unopened opercula.

Molecular analyses

DNA of the S12-4 isolate was extracted using the HipurA Streptomyces DNA purification kit-MB 527-50 pr (HiMedia) according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The primers 27F-5′AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG3′ and 1492R-5′TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT3′ were used to amplify the 16S ribosomal sequence from the genomic DNA in a thermal cycler as follows: initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation 1 min at 94°C, annealing at 54°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and final extension at 72°C for 7 min and then held at 4°C. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were confirmed with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis stained by ethidium bromide (Farris et al. 2007, Valanarasu et al. 2008). The confirmed PCR product was sequenced using the di-deoxy chain termination method in an Applied Biosystems Automated Sequencer (Synergy Scientific Services, Chennai, India). The sequences were identified and compared to the reference species of actinomycetes closely related to the genomes in the database using the National Center for Biotechnical Information (NCBI) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). A phylogenetic tree for isolate S12-4 was constructed with the neighbor-joining method using MEGA4 software. The sequence was submitted to the GenBank, NCBI (Saltau and Nei 1987).

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis

The S12-4 isolate extract was subjected to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis on GC-MS-5975 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA), column DB 5 ms Agilent, dimension length = 30.0 m, internal diameter = 0.2 mm, film thickness = 0.25 μm, with a temperature program of 70–300°C, 10°C /min, injection temperature = 240°C, carrier gas = helium, flow rate =1.51 ml/minute, equipped with GC-MS NIST-II library.

Results

Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) was isolated from soils collected from the Venganayakkan region of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. It was subsequently subcultured on ISP-2 medium, which proved to be a good substrate for the production of the S12-4 isolate with larvicidal properties. Growth of the isolate was inhibited at 70°C and at 10% (w/v) NaCl. Growth was observed in a temperature range of 20–60°C and a pH range of 4–12. Morphological characterizations on various growth media are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Morphological characterization of the active isolate of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) on various culture media.

          Table 1

Biochemical analysis revealed the presence of citrate, lysine, arabinose, malonate, urease, glucose, rhamnose, mannitol, inositol, sorbitol, sucrose, xylose, lactose, arginine, adonitol, and salicin. Antibiotic sensitivity tests demonstrated that among the 37 antibiotics tested, only 14 inhibited S. vinaceusdrappus growth (Table 2). The S12-4 isolate (Accession No. KT827088) showed 99% homology to S. vinaceusdrappus strain NBRC 13099 16S ribosomal RNA gene partial sequence (NR_112368.1). This similarity was corroborated by the phylogenetic tree constructed using MEGA4 software (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Antibiotic sensitivity of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) as determined by disc diffusion method on ISP-2 agar.

          Table 2
Fig. 1. . Phylogenetic tree indicating the taxonomic position of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).Fig. 1. . Phylogenetic tree indicating the taxonomic position of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).Fig. 1. . Phylogenetic tree indicating the taxonomic position of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).
Fig. 1 Phylogenetic tree indicating the taxonomic position of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).

Citation: Journal of Entomological Science 53, 1; 10.18474/JES17-21.1

Concentration–mortality responses at 24 h after exposure varied with the species of mosquito (Table 3). There was no larvicidal or ovicidal activity of the isolate S12-4 extracts against Ae. aegypti. Yet the median lethal concentration (LC50) of the S12-4 ethyl acetate extract against An. stephensi larvae was 141.49 ppm while the LC50 of the methanol extract was 138.20 ppm. The LC50 of the ethyl acetate extract of S12-4 against Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae was 170.55 ppm while the methanol extract LC50 was 180.51 ppm. The LC50 of the ethyl acetate extract against the eggs of An. stephensi was 168.62 ppm while the LC50 for the methanol extract was 171.20 ppm (Table 3). The LC50s for Cx. quinquefasciatus eggs were 224.53 ppm with the ethyl acetate extract and 223.40 ppm for the methanol extract.

Table 3 Concentration–mortality response of An. stephensi and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae and eggs to ethyl acetate and methanol extracts of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) .

          Table 3

Based on the results of the GC-MS analysis, the ethyl acetate extract was composed of 10 compounds, with pentanedioicacid (32.36%), dibutyl phthalate (20.31%), and an unidentified compound (17.03%) being the most abundant (Table 4). The methanol extract was composed of 27 compounds, with n-hexadecanoic acid (23.59%) being the predominant component (Table 5).

Table 4 GC-MS analysis of ethyl acetate extract of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).

          Table 4
Table 5 GC-MS analysis of the methanol extract of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).

          Table 5

Discussion

Certain species of actinomycetes have insecticidal properties, are environmentally friendly and, therefore, have potential for development as alternatives to conventional chemical insecticides. In our study, we successfully isolated the actinomycete S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4) from soils collected in the Venganayakkan region of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Our subsequent study of the S12-4 isolate demonstrated that extracts collected with either ethyl acetate or methanol solvents were biologically active against larvae and eggs of An. stephensi and Cx. quinquefasciatus and effectively expands the number of Streptomyces isolates with activity against mosquito species. These extracts had no activity against Ae. aegypti larvae or eggs in our study. Larvicidal activity also has been reported for ethyl acetate extracts of Streptomyces sp. KA13-3 and Nocardiopsis sp. KA25-A against Cx. quinquefasciatus (Rajesh et al. 2015), actinomycetes isolates SA-10BC, SA-9K, and SA-9L against Cx. quinquefasciatus (Anwar et al. 2014), Streptomyces sp. VITSTK7 against Cx. quinquefasciatus and An. subpictus Grassi (Thenmozhi et al. 2013), S. gedanensis (LK-3) against Cx. quinquefasciatus and Cx. gelidus Theobald (Karthik et al. 2011), and actinomycetes strain LK1 against An. stephensi and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus Giles (Loganathan et al. 2013). Karthik et al. (2011) also found ovicidal activity of extracts from LK-1 and LK-3 against Cx. gelidus and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus.

Based on these results, the S. vinaceusdrappus S12-4 isolate should be further explored as a source of biologically active compounds for development as mosquito larvicides and ovicides. Our characterization of this isolate in terms of antibiotic sensitivity (Table 2), chemical composition (Tables 4, 5), and phylogeny (Fig. 1) serves as a foundation for these further studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, and Chennai for providing financial support and facilities. The project was also partially supported by ISPP at King Saud University through ISPP No. 0020.

References Cited

  • Abbott, W.S.
    1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265267.
  • Anwar, A.,
    B. Ali,
    F. Qamar
    and
    I. Sajid.
    2014. Insecticidal activity of actinomycetes isolated from Salt Range, Pakistan against mosquitoes and red flour beetle. Pak. J. Zool. 46: 8392.
  • Bream, A.S.,
    S.A. Ghazal,
    Z.K.A. El-Aziz
    and
    S.Y. Ibrahim.
    2001. Insecticidal activity of selected actinomycetes strains against the Egyptian cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Meded. Fac. Landbouwkd. Toegep. Biol. Wet. Univ. Gent66(
    2a
    ): 503544.
  • Demain, A.L.
    2006. From natural products discovery to commercialization: A success story. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33: 486495.
  • Edwards, C.
    1992. Isolation, properties and potential applications of thermophilic actinomycetes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 42: 161179.
  • Elango, G.,
    A. Bagavan,
    C. Kamaraj,
    A.A. Zahir
    and
    A.A. Rahuman.
    2009. Oviposition-deterrent, ovicidal, and repellent activities of indigenous plant extracts against Anopheles subpictus Grassi (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol. Res. 105(
    6
    ): 15671576.
  • El-Khawagh, M.A.,
    K.S. Hamadah
    and
    T.M. El-Sheikh.
    2011. The insecticidal activity of actinomycete metabolites, against the mosquito Culex pipiens. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 4: 103113.
  • Farris, M.H.
    and
    J.B. Olson.
    2007. Detection of actinobacteria cultivated from environmental samples reveals bias in universal primers. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45: 376381.
  • Ishida, N.,
    K. Miyazaki,
    K. Kumagai
    and
    M. Rikimaru.
    1965. Neocarzinostatin, an antitumor antibiotic of high molecular weight, isolation, physiochemical properties and biological activities. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo)18: 6876.
  • Karthik, L.,
    K. Gaurav,
    K.V.B. Rao,
    G. Rajakumar
    and
    A.A. Rahuman.
    2011. Larvicidal, repellent, and ovicidal activity of marine actinobacteria extracts against Culex tritaeniorhynchus and Culex gelidus. Parasitol. Res. 108: 14471455.
  • Locci, R.
    1989. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology.
    Williams & Wilkins Co
    .,
    Baltimore, MD
    .
  • Loganathan, K.,
    G. Kumar,
    A.V. Kirthi,
    K.V. Rao
    and
    A.A. Rahuman.
    2013. Entomopathogenic marine actinomycetes as potential and low-cost biocontrol agents against bloodsucking arthropods. Parasitol. Res. 112: 39513959.
  • Rajesh, K.,
    D. Dhanasekaran
    and
    B.K. Tyagi.
    2015. Mosquito survey and larvicidal activity of actinobacterial isolates against Culex larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 14: 116122.
  • Saltau, N.
    and
    M. Nei.
    1987. The neighbor joining method: A new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406425.
  • Saravanakumar, P.,
    J.P. Raj,
    V. Duraipandiyan
    and
    S. Ignacimuthu.
    2012. Antibacterial activity of some actinomycetes from Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2: 936946.
  • Sundarapandian, S.,
    M.D. Sundaram,
    P. Tholkappian
    and
    V. Balasubramanian.
    2002. Mosquitocidal properties of indigenous fungi and actinomycetes against Culex quinquefasciatus Say. J. Biol. Control16: 8991.
  • Thenmozhi, M.,
    J.V. Gopal,
    K. Kannabiran,
    G. Rajakumar,
    K. Velayutham
    and
    A.A. Rahuman.
    2013. Eco-friendly approach using marine actinobacteria and its compounds to control ticks and mosquitoes. Parasitol. Res. 112: 719729.
  • Valanarasu, M.,
    V. Duraipandiyan,
    P. Agastian
    and
    S. Ignacimuthu.
    2008. Antimicrobial activity of Streptomyces sp. ERI-26 recovered from Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu. J. Mycol. Med. 18: 147153.
  • Valanarasu, M.,
    V. Duraipandiyan,
    P. Agastian
    and
    S. Ignacimuthu.
    2009. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Streptomyces spp. ERI-3 isolated from Western Ghats rock soil (India). J. Mycol. Med. 19: 2228.
  • Vining, L.C.
    1992. Secondary metabolism, inventive evolution and biochemical diversity: A review. Gene115: 135140.
  • Waksmans, A.
    1961. The Actinomycetes. Vol. 11.
    Williams & Wilkins Co
    .,
    Baltimore, MD
    .
  • World Health Organization. 2005. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/13.
    WHO
    ,
    Geneva, Switzerland
    .
  • Yao, H.C.
    2002. Veterinary Microbiology Experiment Manual, 2nd edition.
    Agricultural Press
    ,
    Beijing, China
    .
<bold>Fig. 1</bold>
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree indicating the taxonomic position of S. vinaceusdrappus (S12-4).


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author (email: eriloyola@hotmail.com); Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai 600 034, Tamil Nadu, India; and International Scientific Partnership Program (ISPP), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Received: 13 Feb 2017
Accepted: 06 Jun 2017
  • Download PDF