Save
Download PDF

Abstract

A great number of cell lines from hemipteran, lepidopteran, and dipteran insects have been developed and characterized. Using the advent of new techniques and instruments in molecular biology as well as the advancement in biotechnology, the indigenous cell lines might prove useful in the development of alternatives to conventional chemical pesticides for agriculture and in the creation of vaccines and life-saving pharmaceuticals for human and animal diseases. Cell cultures of insects are used for the generation of vaccines, viral pesticides, and recombinant proteins, and in basic research in virology, endocrinology, molecular biology, genetics, and biochemistry. This paper summarizes information collected regarding the different insect cell lines developed and characterized thus far and also describes different applications in entomological research.

Keywords: insect cell lines; tissue culture; cell culture

At present, according to American Type Culture Collection records, there are more than 4,000 cell lines from more than 150 distinct species including approximately 1,000 cancer cell lines and other collections, such as stem cells (https://www.atcc.org/en/Products/CellsandMicroorganisms/Cell_Lines.aspx). Newly established cell lines are to be authorized by the International Cell Line Authentication Committee. Regularly used immortalized cell lines are HeLa (human epithelial cells), 3T3 (mouse fibroblast), S2 (Drosophila macrophage-like cells), and Sf9 (fall armyworm ovary cells) (Alberts et al. 2002). Although immortalized cells are suitable for conducting research in controlled environments, proteome profiling reveals that immortalized cell lines can have significant rearrangement of metabolic pathways and up-regulation in cell cycle-assoc (Craven et al. 2006, Merkley et al. 2009, Pan et al. 2009). Our objective in this report was to review currently available information on the types, historical uses, and potential uses of cell cultures related to entomological research.

Definitions and Types of Cell Cultures

The isolation of cells from animal tissues and their subsequent and successful growth in artificial culture situation is referred as cell culture (Phelan and May 2016, Reid et al. 2016). Cells for cell culture might be removed directly from the tissue and separated by mechanical or enzymatic means, or they might be collected from a previously established cell line or cell strain (Goosen 1993, Weiss et al. 1993). Cells thus removed from tissues of a variety of living organisms can be maintained in culture vessels under appropriate conditions (Annathur et al. 2003, Rieffel et al. 2014, Schlaeger 1996) including suitable culture media, incubation temperature, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and humidity (Landauer 2014, Spasojevic 2016). In general, the culture medium is composed of various amino acids, salts, vitamins, serum or other proteins, and antibiotics (Abitorabi and Wilcox 2011). Primary cell cultures are those derived from cells removed from tissue without any cell multiplication. Any subsequent cultures from cell multiplication are termed secondary cultures (Fischer et al. 2010, Sullivan 2010). Most cell lines are anchor-dependent and are cultured while attached to a substrate and are known as monolayer cultures or adherent cell cultures (Danielsson et al. 2010), whereas others that are able to be grown suspended in the culture medium are called suspension cultures (Rowghani et al. 2004, Willems and Jorissen 2004).

History of Insect Cell Culture

Harrison (1907) is the first reporter of cell culture use in research in his paper on the nerve cells of frogs in a hanging drop culture. Earle (1944), who had previously created a continuous cell line from a rodent, developed the first human cancer cell line in culture. Gey et al. (1952) produced the first human immortalized cell line (HeLa) from cervical cancer cells from cancer patient Henrietta Lacks. The continued existence and use of the HeLa cell line has produced noteworthy results, including the development of the polio virus vaccine by Jonas Salk, while posing ethical issues involved in its initial collection and continued use. In this regard Skloot (2010) strongly believes that views of individuals should be respected and not taken for granted. Eagle's (1955a, b,c) development of growth media led to the extensive use of cell cultures in vitro for biological research. Most of cell culture media currently used in cell biology research are based on the Eagle medium.

Prior to those developments, several entomologists had already reported use of insect cell cultures developed in vitro as a research tool. Goldschmidt (1915) placed spermatocysts from the cecropia moth (Hyalophota cecropia (L.)) into culture to monitor the development of the spermatozoa, while Glaser and Chapman (1912) successfully followed the development of wilt disease in cultured insect hemocytes. These early experiments utilized a basic salt solution or hemolymph as the culture growth medium, but those cultures usually could not be maintained for more than few days. Almost 50 yr later, Grace (1962a,b) successfully developed insect cell cultures that he maintained for long periods of time in the laboratory. With this development, by 1999 over 500 continuous insect cell lines from more than 100 species of insects had reportedly been developed and maintained (Lynn 1999a, b).

Continuous cell lines of insects are important for research on the molecular mechanisms involved in viral infections of insect cells. From the time when the insect cell lines were first developed (Grace 1962b) and cell lines were successfully infected with plant virus in vitro (Chiu and Black 1967), numerous insect cell lines have been developed for studies of the kinetics by which these cell lines are infected and the characterization of the viral genomes. These investigations prompted a series of studies in which leafhopper continuous cell lines were utilized to study many plant-infecting rhabdoviruses and reoviruses (Chiu et al. 1970, Hsu and Black 1973). Grace's (1962a,b) successes were also followed by the development of various insect cell lines from coleopteran, dipteran, lepidopteran, and orthopteran insects (Li and Bonning 2007, Lynn 2007, Vlak 2007). More notable insect cell lines are listed in Table 1 with the source of each and its applications in entomological research.

Table 1 Available list of significant insect cell lines and their applications with source details.

          Table 1

Establishment and Maintenance of Insect Cell Lines

Cell lines can be successfully established from tissues or cells of insect larvae or pupae. The Sf21, Sf9, and the BTI-TN-5B1-4 (or High Five) cells are the most commonly used insect cell lines in research (Table 1). These three cell lines are derived from lepidopterans. The Sf9 and Sf21 are from pupal ovarian tissue of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), and the High Five cells are from ovarian tissue of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner). Transformed stable insect cell lines are often from dipteran insects including the fruit flies (Tephritidae, Drosophilidae) and mosquitoes (Culicidae), among which the cell line Drosophila melanogaster Schneider 2 (S2), derived from D. melanogaster Meigen, is most commonly used in insect cell line research.

Insect cell lines are isolated from different tissues and organs (i.e., fat body, embryonic tissues, ovaries, imaginal discs, testis, dorsal vessel, etc.) at different stages of development. Overall, the greatest number of insect cell lines have been developed from the embryonic tissues, followed by ovarian tissue; however, in India, the majority of lepidopteran cell lines have been developed from the ovarian tissue, followed by embryonic tissue (Pant et al. 2002).

Culture media for maintaining cell culture lines are complex combinations of amino acids, salts, vitamins, growth factors, carbohydrates, metabolic precursors, trace elements, and hormones. The requirements for these constituents differ among various cell lines. Carbohydrates are generally provided as glucose, but in few instances, glucose is substituted with galactose in order to reduce lactic acid accumulation in the cultures. Other carbon sources include some amino acids (especially l-glutamine) and pyruvate. pH is maintained by one or more buffering systems with CO2/sodium bicarbonate, phosphate, and HEPES (N-[2-hydroxyethyl]piperazine-N′-[2-ethanesulfonic acid]) as the most commonly used. Serum also is found in a complete medium. Commonly used culture media are the Eagle Minimal Medium, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium, and Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium (Arora 2013).

Insect cell lines are usually maintained at 26–28°C. Maintenance below the optimal temperature range will yield decreased cell growth rate. Above 30°C, cells may become increasingly less viable and may not recover viability even when the temperature is reduced to the optimal range (Drugmand et al. 2012).

Subculturing of the cell line cultures must be performed periodically to retain log phase growth and maximum viability. Anchor-dependent monolayer, or adherent, cell cultures should be subcultured at 100% confluence, typically at a 1:5 dilution (volume of cells to final volume of medium) in order to maintain log phase growth. Suspension cell cultures should be subcultured to a concentration of 0.7 × 106 to 1.0 × 106 cells/ml before reaching a density of 2.0 × 106 to 2.5 × 106 cells/ml. If surplus cells are available from subculturing, those should be preserved in a suitable protective agent (e.g., glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide) and stored at temperatures below −130°C (cryopreservation) until they are needed for experimentation (ATCC 2012).

Newly established insect cell lines are characterized using the usual parameters of morphology, growth curve, species specificity, karyology, etc. Morphology and viability must be microscopically recorded at regular intervals. The growth medium also must be monitored for microbial contamination, which may be presented as unusual shifts in pH, increased turbidity, or appearance of suspended particles. In addition to daily inspections, it is important to test a sample of the culture regularly for the presence of bacteria, fungi, and mycoplasma. There are several methods that can be used to check for these contaminants (Sudeep et al. 2005).

Cells grown in suspension cultures develop either as single cells or as groups of cells. Viable cells appear round and refractive while dead cells are smaller and darker. Some cells may attach and grow on the inner surface of the culture vessel and appear round or flattened, resulting in some cell lines developing as mixed adherent and suspension cultures. The percentage of these adherent cells varies with conditions and cell density. Cell debris may also be detected in healthy cell culture populations (ATCC ®Animal Cell Culture Guidetips and techniques for continuous cell lines, www.atcc.org). Both trypan blue and erythrosine B stains are used to conduct periodic viability assays to quantify the number of viable cells in a cell culture population. Both stains are excluded by the cell membranes of living cells but are taken up and retained by dead cells, which lack intact cell membranes (Krause et al. 1984).

Concluding Comments

Establishing insect cell lines for a specific research objective is often a slow and challenging undertaking. Primary cell cultures may not develop into cell lines in all cases. Many of the isolated cells may take several months to be successfully cultured, and the resulting cells may not be appropriate for the preferred application. Of the approximately 950,000 insect species that reportedly exist, we have only 1,000+ insect cell lines from only approximately 100 insect species.

Additional challenges to insect cell culture reside with development of growth media for specific needs. Media required for all the various sources of cells for culture are presently not available and have not been developed. Furthermore, large-scale production of insect viruses in insect cell culture lines requires media ideal for cell line growth as well as for the replication of the virus agents. Each cell line and virus culture combination may likely require its own unique medium composition.

Development of continuous cell lines from aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae), the most significant insect group of plant virus vectors, have been attempted with no success thus far, perhaps due to the lack of a suitable growth medium or suboptimal use of other factors involved in the establishment of the cell cultures (Peters 1971, Peters and Black 1970). Efforts have also been made to initiate thrips (Thysanotera) cell lines (Kritzman et al. 2002, Nagata et al. 1997). Although limited success has been reported, secondary cultures have not been successfully maintained. Yet, such cultures are required for research regarding virus infection of host cells, determination of the existence of viral receptors on cell surfaces, virus replication and development within the cell, and virus escape from the cells. Establishing continuous cell culture lines from a natural insect vector of a plant virus is essential for examining insect–virus interactions and, thus, developing innovative management methods.

Acknowledgments

We thank Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India for ICAR Extramural Project on “Scaled Up Production & Field Evaluation of Bt.” Our sincere thanks also to the Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India, for providing necessary facilities for this research.

References Cited

  • Abitorabi, A.M.
    and
    C. Wilcox.
    2011. Metabolic enhancers: A new paradigm in cell culture media optimization. BMC Proc. 5(
    Suppl. 8
    ): 19.

  • Alberts, B.,
    A. Johnson,
    J. Lewis,
    M. Raff,
    K. Roberts
    and
    P. Walter.
    2002. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th ed.
    Garland Science
    ,
    New York
    .

  • Annathur, G.V.,
    J.L. Pierce,
    R.G. Combs,
    A.S. Rathore,
    A. Banerjee
    and
    D.E. Steinmeyer.
    2003. Improvements in spinner-flask designs for insect-cell suspension culture. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 38: 1518.

  • Arora, M.
    2013. Cell media culture: A review. Mater. Methods3: 175.

  • [ATCC] American Type Culture Collection. 2012. Thawing, propagating and cryopreserving protocol (ATCC®HTB-26™) March 1, 2012;Version1.5. www.atcc.org.

  • Belloncik, S.,
    O. Petcharawan,
    M. Couillard,
    G. Charpentier,
    B. Larue,
    H. Guardado,
    S. Charaeonsak
    and
    S. Imanishi.
    2007. Development and characterization of a continuous cell line, AFKM-On-H, from hemocytes of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 43: 245254.

  • Bell-Sakyi, L.,
    E. Zweygarth,
    E.F. Blouin,
    E.A. Gould
    and
    F. Jongejan.
    2007. Tick cell lines: Tools for tick and tick-borne disease research. Trends Parasitol. 23: 450457.

  • Benting, J.,
    S. Lecat,
    D. Zacchetti
    and
    K. Simons.
    2000. Protein expression in Drosophila Schneider cells. Anal. Biochem. 278: 5968.

  • Chen, Y.P.,
    D.E. Gundersen-Rindal
    and
    D.E. Lynn.
    2005. Baculovirus-based expression of an insect viral protein in 12 different insect cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 41: 4349.

  • Chiu, R.J.
    and
    L.M. Black.
    1967. Monolayer cultures of insect cell lines and their inoculation with a plant virus. Nature215: 10761078.

  • Chiu, R.J.,
    H.Y. Liu,
    R. MacLeod
    and
    L.M. Black.
    1970. Potato yellow dwarf virus in leafhopper cell culture. Virology40: 387396.

  • Craven, R.A.,
    A.J. Stanley,
    S. Hanrahan,
    J. Dods,
    R. Unwin,
    N. Totty,
    P. Harnden,
    I. Eardley,
    P.J. Selby
    and
    R.E. Banks.
    2006. Proteomic analysis of primary cell lines identifies protein changes present in renal cell carcinoma. Proteomics6: 28532864.

  • Danielsson, A.P.,
    T. Moritz,
    H. Mulder
    and
    P. Spegel.
    2010. Development and optimization of a metabolomic method for analysis of adherent cell cultures. Anal. Biochem. 404: 3039.

  • Davis, T.R.,
    T.J. Wickham,
    K.A. McKenna,
    R.R. Granados,
    M.L. Shuler
    and
    H.A. Wood.
    1993. Comparative recombinant protein production of eight insect cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 29A: 388390.

  • Drugmand, J.C.,
    Y.J. Schneider
    and
    S.N. Agathos.
    2012. Insect cells as factories for biomanufacturing. Biotechnol. Adv. 30: 11401157.

  • Duan, Y.
    and
    Y. Zhang.
    2014. Review of the grassland leafhopper genus Nephotettix Matsumura (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Chiasmini) from the Chinese mainland. Zootaxa3755: 201229.

  • Eagle, H.
    1955 a. The growth requirements of two mammalian cell lines in tissue culture. Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians68: 7881.

  • Eagle, H.
    1955 b. Nutrition needs of mammalian cells in tissue culture. Science122: 501514.

  • Eagle, H.
    1955 c. The specific amino acid requirements of a human carcinoma cell (strain HeLa) in tissue culture. J. Exp. Med. 102: 3748.

  • Earle, D.P.
    1944. Renal excretion of sulfamerazine. J. Clin. Invest. 23: 914920.

  • Fernon, C.A.,
    R.J. Osborne
    and
    D.J. Dall.
    1996. Cell lines from the melolonthine scarab Antitrogus parvulus. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 32: 8589.

  • Fischer, R.,
    S. Steinert,
    U. Frober,
    D. Voges,
    M. Stubenrauch,
    G.O. Hofmann
    and
    H. Witte.
    2010. Cell cultures in microsystems: Biocompatibility aspects. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108: 687693.

  • Gey, G.O.,
    W.D. Coffman
    and
    M.T. Kubicek.
    1952. Tissue culture studies of the proliferative capacity of cervical carcinoma and normal epithelium. Cancer Res. 12: 264265.

  • Glaser, R.W.
    and
    J.W. Chapman.
    1912. Studies on the wilt disease, or “Flacheria” of the gypsy moth. Science36: 219224.

  • Goldschmidt, R.
    1915. Some experiments on spermatogenesis in vitro. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1: 220222.

  • Goodman, C.L.,
    G.N. El Sayed,
    A.H. McIntosh,
    J.J. Grasela
    and
    B. Stiles.
    2001a. Establishment and characterization of insect cell lines from 10 lepidopteran species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.– Anim. 37: 367373.

  • Goodman, C.L.,
    A.H. McIntosh,
    G.N. El Sayed,
    J.J. Grasela
    and
    B. Stiles.
    2001 b. Production of selected baculoviruses in newly established lepidopteran cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 37: 374379.

  • Goodwin, R.H.,
    G.J. Tompkins,
    and
    P. McCawley.
    1978. Gypsy moth cell lines divergent in viral susceptibility. I. Culture and identification. In Vitro14: 485494.

  • Goosen, M.F.
    1993. Insect cell culture engineering: An overview. Bioprocess Tech. 17: 116.

  • Grace, T.D.
    1962 a. The development of a cytoplasmic polyhedrosis in insect cells grown in vitro. Virology18: 3342.

  • Grace, T.D.
    1962 b. Establishment of four strains of cells from insect tissues grown in vitro. Nature195: 788789.

  • Grasela, J.J.,
    A.H. McIntosh,
    J.J. Ringbauer,
    C.L. Goodman,
    J.E. Carpenter
    and
    H.J. Popham.
    2012. Development of cell lines from the cactophagous insect: Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and their susceptibility to three baculoviruses. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 48: 293300.

  • Hara, K.,
    M. Funakoshi,
    K. Tsuda
    and
    T. Kawarabata.
    1993. New Spodoptera exigua cell lines susceptible to Spodoptera exigua nuclear polyhedrosis virus. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 29A: 904907.

  • Harrison, R.G.,
    M.J. Greenman,
    F.P. Mall
    and
    C.M. Jackson.
    1907. Observations of the living developing nerve fiber. Anatomical Rec. 1: 116128.

  • Hashiyama, A.,
    M. Nomura,
    J. Kurihara
    and
    G. Toyoshima.
    2011. Application of molecular techniques to identification of three plusiine species, Autographa nigrisigna, Macdunnoughia confusa, and Thysanoplusia intermixta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), found in integrated pest management lettuce fields in Japan. J. Econ. Entomol. 104: 12801285.

  • Hernandez-Crespo, P.,
    C. Lopez-Blachere,
    M. Bergoin
    and
    J.M. Quiot.
    2000. Establishment of two new orthopteran cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 36: 559562.

  • Hink, W.F.
    1970. Established insect cell line from the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Nature226: 466467.

  • Hink, W.F.,
    D.R. Thomsen,
    D.J. Davidson,
    A.L. Meyer
    and
    F.J. Castellino.
    1991. Expression of three recombinant proteins using baculovirus vectors in 23 insect cell lines. Biotech. Progr. 7: 914.

  • Hsu, H.T.
    and
    L.M. Black.
    1973. Inoculation of vector cell monolayers with potato yellow dwarf virus. Virology52: 187198.

  • Iwabuchi, K.
    1999. An established cell line from the beetle, Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim.35: 612–615.

  • Komano, H.,
    E. Kasama,
    Y. Nagasawa,
    Y. Nakanishi,
    K. Matsuyama,
    K. Ando
    and
    S. Natori.
    1987. Purification of Sarcophaga (fleshfly) lectin and detection of sarcotoxins in the culture medium of NIH-Sape-4, an embryonic cell line of Sarcophaga peregrina. Biochem. J. 248: 217222.

  • Kozlov, E.A.,
    N.V. Rodnin,
    T.L. Levitina,
    N.M. Gusak
    and
    S.A. Atepalikhina.
    1990. Primary structure of granulin of the granulosis virus of Agrotis segetum. Bioorganicheskaia khimiia16: 16751677.

  • Krause, A.W.,
    W.W. Carley
    and
    W.W. Webb.
    1984. Fluorescent erythrosin B is preferable to trypan blue as a vital exclusion dye for mammalian cells in monolayer culture. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 32: 10841090.

  • Kritzman, A.,
    A. Gera,
    B. Raccah,
    J.W. Van Lent
    and
    D. Peters.
    2002. The route of tomato spotted wilt virus inside the thrips body in relation to transmission efficiency. Arch. Virol. 147: 21432156.

  • Landauer, K.
    2014. Designing media for animal cell culture: CHO cells, the industrial standard. Methods Mol. Biol. 1104: 89103.

  • Li, H.
    and
    B.C. Bonning.
    2007. Evaluation of the insecticidal efficacy of wild type and recombinant baculoviruses, Pp. 379405. In
    Murhammer, D.W.
    (ed.), Methods in Molecular Biology Series. Baculovirus and Insect Cell Expression Protocols. Springer, New York.

  • Liu, G.,
    Y. Xu
    and
    X. Yu.
    2015. Establishment and characterization of a new cell line of Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralididae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 51: 218221.

  • Lynn, D.E.
    1999 a. Comparison of cell line maintenance procedures on insect cells used for producing baculoviruses. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 35: 248251.

  • Lynn, D.E.
    1999 b. Development of insect cell lines: Virus susceptibility and applicability to prawn cell culture. Methods Cell Sci. 21: 173181.

  • Lynn, D.E.
    2003. Comparative susceptibilities of twelve insect cell lines to infection by three baculoviruses. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 82: 129131.

  • Lynn, D.E.
    2007. Available lepidopteran insect cell lines, Pp. 117144. In
    Murhammer, D.W.
    (ed.), Methods in Molecular Biology Series. Baculovirus and Insect Cell Expression Protocols. Springer, New York.

  • Lynn, D.E.
    and
    S.M. Ferkovich.
    2004. New cell lines from Ephestia kuehniella: Characterization and susceptibility to baculoviruses. J. Insect Sci. 4: 9.

  • Ma, H.,
    T.A. Galvin,
    D.R. Glasner,
    S. Shaheduzzaman
    and
    A.S. Khan.
    2014. Identification of a novel rhabdovirus in Spodoptera frugiperda cell lines. J. Virol. 88: 65766585.

  • McIntosh, A.H.,
    P.D. Christian
    and
    J.J. Grasela.
    1999. The establishment of heliothine cell lines and their susceptibility to two baculoviruses. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 35: 9497.

  • Merkley, M.A.,
    E. Hildebrandt,
    R.H. Podolsky,
    H. Arnouk,
    D.G. Ferris,
    W.S. Dynan
    and
    H. Stoppler.
    2009. Large-scale analysis of protein expression changes in human keratinocytes immortalized by human papilloma virus type 16 E6 and E7 oncogenes. Proteome Sci. 7: 29.

  • Mitsuhashi, J.
    1989. Invertebrate Cell System Applications.
    CRC Press
    ,
    Boca Raton, FL
    .

  • Nagata, T.,
    M.M. Storms,
    R. Goldbach
    and
    D. Peters.
    1997. Multiplication of tomato spotted wilt virus in primary cell cultures derived from two thrips species. Virus Res. 49: 5966.

  • Pan, C.,
    C. Kumar,
    S. Bohl,
    U. Klingmueller
    and
    M. Mann.
    2009. Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8: 443450.

  • Pant, U.,
    A.B. Sudeep,
    S.S. Athawale
    and
    V.C. Vipat.
    2002. Studies in new, indigenous lepidopteran cell lines. Indian J. Exp. Biol40: 6368.

  • Peters, D.
    1971. Relationships between plant viruses and their aphid and leafhopper vectors. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 46(
    Suppl.
    ): 233242.

  • Peters, D.
    and
    L.M. Black.
    1970. Infection of primary cultures of aphid cells with a plant virus. Virology40: 847853.

  • Phelan, K.
    and
    K.M. May.
    2016. Basic techniques in mammalian cell tissue culture. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. 70: A 3B 1–A 3B 22.

  • Reid, S.,
    L.C. Chan,
    L. Matindoost,
    C. Pushparajan
    and
    G. Visnovsky.
    2016. Cell culture for production of insecticidal viruses. Methods Mol. Biol. 1477: 95117.

  • Rey, G.J.,
    C. Ferro
    and
    F.J. Bello.
    2000. Establishment and characterization of a new continuous cell line from Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) and its susceptibility to infections with arboviruses and Leishmania chagasi. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz95: 103110.

  • Rieffel, S.,
    S. Roest,
    J. Klopp,
    S. Carnal,
    S. Marti,
    B. Gerhartz
    and
    B. Shrestha.
    2014 . Insect cell culture in reagent bottles. MethodsX1: 155161.

  • Rowghani, N.M.,
    M.K. Heise,
    D. McKeel,
    E.A. McGee,
    R.R. Koepsel
    and
    A.J. Russel.
    2004. Maintenance of morphology and growth of ovarian follicles in suspension culture. Tissue Eng. 10: 545552.

  • Schlaeger, E.J.
    1996. Medium design for insect cell culture. Cytotechnology20: 5770.

  • Shih, C.J.,
    R.W. Lin
    and
    C.H. Wang.
    1997. Establishment of a cell line from Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and replication of S. litura nuclear polyhedrosis virus in vitro. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 69: 16.

  • Skloot, R.
    2010. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
    Random House
    ,
    New York
    .

  • Spasojevic, I.
    2016. What if cell culture media do not mimic in vivo redox settings?Redox Rep. Comm. Free Radical Res. 21: 127129.

  • Sudeep, A.B.,
    D.T. Mourya
    and
    A.C. Mishra.
    2005. Insect cell culture in research: Indian scenario. Indian J. Med. Res. 121: 725738.

  • Sudeep, A.B.,
    D.T. Mourya,
    Y.S. Shouche,
    V. Pidiyar
    and
    U. Pant.
    2002. A new cell line from the embryonic tissue of Helicoverpa armigera HBN. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 38: 262264.

  • Sullivan, E.
    2010. Six tips for more successful cell cultures. MLO Med. Lab. Obs. 42: 44, 46.

  • Suske, G.
    2000. Transient transfection of Schneider cells in the study of transcription factors. Methods Mol. Biol. 130: 175187.

  • Vlak, J.M.
    2007. Professor Shang yin Gao (1909–1989): His legacy in insect cell culture and insect virology. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 95: 152160.

  • Volkman, L.E.
    and
    P.A. Goldsmith.
    1982. Generalized immunoassay for Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus Infectivity in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44: 227233.

  • Weiss, S.A.,
    G.P. Godwin,
    S.F. Gorfien
    and
    W.G. Whitford.
    1993. Insect cell culture engineering. Serum-free media. Bioprocess Technol. 17: 179194.

  • Wilde, M.,
    M. Klausberger,
    D. Palmberger,
    W. Ernst
    and
    R. Grabherr.
    2014. Tnao38, high five and Sf9—Evaluation of host-virus interactions in three different insect cell lines: Baculovirus production and recombinant protein expression. Biotech. Lett. 36: 743749.

  • Willems, T.
    and
    M. Jorissen.
    2004. Sequential monolayer-suspension culture of human airway epithelial cells. J. Cystic Fibrosis3(
    Suppl. 2
    ): 5354.

  • Yanase, T.,
    C. Yasunaga
    and
    T. Kawarabata.
    1998. Replication of Spodoptera exigua nucleopolyhedrovirus in permissive and non-permissive lepidopteran cell lines. Acta Virol. 42: 293298.

  • Zhang, F.,
    M.A. Manzan,
    H.M. Peplinski
    and
    S.M. Thiem.
    2008. A new Trichoplusia ni cell line for membrane protein expression using a baculovirus expression vector system. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 44: 214223.

  • Zhang, X.,
    Y. Feng,
    W.F. Ding,
    X. Li
    and
    C.Y. Wang.
    2015. A new continuous cell line from Blaps rhynchoptera Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 51: 151156.

  • Download PDF

Contributor Notes

Corresponding authors (E-mail: arunkarthick.biotech@gmail.com; asokaniihr@gmail.com).
Received: Dec 21, 2016
Accepted: Apr 28, 2017