Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jul 2006

Effects of Aphid (Homoptera) Abundance and Surrounding Vegetation on the Encounter Rate of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera), Chrysopidae (Neuroptera), and Nabidae (Hemiptera) in Alfalfa

,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 211 – 220
DOI: 10.18474/0749-8004-41.3.211
Save
Download PDF

Predaceous insect encounter rate was measured in 21 southeast Nebraska alfalfa fields through weekly sweep net sampling during 2002–03. The most frequently encountered predaceous insect families were Coccinellidae (Coleoptera), Nabidae (Hemiptera), and Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). The study used multiple regression analysis to examine the effect of aphid abundance and the surrounding vegetative patch composition on predaceous insect abundance. In 2002, Hippodamia parenthesis Say was encountered more frequently in fields with lower aphid abundances, and Hippodamia convergens Guerin-Meneville, Coccinella septem-punctata L., and Nabis americoferus Carayon were encountered more frequently in fields with higher aphid abundances. In 2003, Coleomegilla maculata DeGeer was encountered more frequently in fields with higher aphid abundance. The remaining two species of coccinellids and Chryoperla spp. did not exhibit significant correlations with aphid abundance in either year. It was determined that in 2002, H. parenthesis was encountered more frequently in alfalfa surrounded by a higher percentage of unfarmed land, and C. maculata, C. septempunctata, N. americoferus, and Chrysoperla spp. were encountered more frequently in alfalfa surrounded by a higher percentage of farmed land. In 2003, N. americoferus was again encountered more frequently in alfalfa fields surrounded by a higher percentage of farmed land. The remaining three coccinellid species collected did not exhibit significant relationships between vegetative patch composition and encounter rate in either year.

Copyright: © 2006 Georgia Entomological Society, Inc.

Contributor Notes

2University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, Central Plains Center for Bioassessment.

3University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, Department of Entomology; Address inquiries (email: sdanielsonl@unl.edu).

4University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, School of Natural Resources Science.

5University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, Department of Statistics.

6South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, Geographic Information Science Center of Excellence.

Received: 21 Oct 2005
Accepted: 15 May 2006
  • Download PDF